The Justice Corner is a leading law firm in Bangladesh, offering specialized legal services to both local and international clients. We serve as trusted advisors to prominent businesses, companies, and banks.

Blog Details

Supreme Court of Bangladesh: Appellate Division vs High Court Division

Supreme Court of Bangladesh: Appellate Division vs High Court Division

 

The Supreme Court of Bangladesh is the highest court in the country's judicial system. It consists of two distinct divisions: the Appellate Division and the High Court Division.

Although both are part of the same Supreme Court, they do not perform the same functions. The High Court Division has broad original, appellate, revisional and constitutional jurisdiction, while the Appellate Division primarily exercises the highest appellate jurisdiction over decisions of the High Court Division.

Understanding the difference between the Appellate Division and High Court Division is important for anyone dealing with a constitutional matter, civil dispute, criminal case, writ petition, appeal, revision or other legal proceeding in Bangladesh.

Article 94 of the Constitution expressly establishes the Supreme Court with these two divisions. The Constitution also provides that Supreme Court judges exercise their judicial functions independently, subject to the constitutional framework.

Legal information notice: This article provides general legal information about the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. It is not individualized legal advice. Jurisdiction, procedure, limitation and available remedies depend on the applicable law and facts of each case. Current legislation, Supreme Court rules and judgments should be checked before taking legal action.

What Is the Supreme Court of Bangladesh?

The Supreme Court of Bangladesh is the country's apex court and is constitutionally divided into:

  1. The Appellate Division
  2. The High Court Division

The Constitution provides the basic jurisdiction of both divisions, while legislation and Supreme Court rules provide additional procedural and substantive frameworks.

The two divisions should not be viewed simply as two levels of the same type of court.

The High Court Division performs several functions. It can hear certain matters at first instance, hear appeals and revisions from subordinate courts and tribunals, exercise constitutional jurisdiction, and perform other functions assigned by law.

The Appellate Division, by contrast, principally hears appeals from judgments, decrees, orders and sentences of the High Court Division. The Constitution also gives it review and advisory powers.

Appellate Division vs High Court Division at a Glance

IssueHigh Court DivisionAppellate Division
PositionOne of the two divisions of the Supreme CourtOne of the two divisions of the Supreme Court
Main constitutional provisionsArticles 101 and 102, among othersArticles 103 to 106, among others
Original jurisdictionYes, in matters provided by the Constitution or lawGenerally not an ordinary court of first instance
Appellate jurisdictionYesYes, principally over High Court Division decisions
Writ jurisdictionYes, under Article 102No equivalent general Article 102 writ jurisdiction
Revisional jurisdictionYes, where conferred by lawPrimarily appellate and other constitutional functions
Constitutional enforcementMajor constitutional role, including fundamental-rights enforcementHears appeals arising within its constitutional jurisdiction
AppealsHears appeals from subordinate courts and tribunals where law providesHears appeals from High Court Division
Leave to appealNot applicable in the same constitutional senseRequired in many cases
ReviewGoverned by applicable law and rulesArticle 105 expressly provides review jurisdiction
Advisory jurisdictionNo equivalent Article 106 functionYes
Binding effectIts declared law binds subordinate courtsIts declared law binds the High Court Division and subordinate courts

The exact jurisdiction in a particular case must always be determined from the Constitution, applicable legislation and Supreme Court rules.

What Does the Constitution Say About the Supreme Court?

Article 94 of the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court and states that it comprises the Appellate Division and the High Court Division.

It also provides for the Chief Justice and other judges appointed to the respective divisions. Judges appointed to the Appellate Division sit in that division, while the other judges sit in the High Court Division, subject to the constitutional framework.

This constitutional structure is important because the two divisions have separate jurisdictions.

The distinction is therefore not merely administrative. It directly affects where a case may be filed, which remedy is available and how a judgment can be challenged.

What Is the High Court Division?

The High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh is the division with broad original, appellate and other jurisdiction.

Article 101 provides that the High Court Division has such original, appellate and other jurisdictions and powers as are conferred by the Constitution or other laws.

The Bangladesh Judiciary identifies several categories of High Court Division jurisdiction, including original jurisdiction in matters such as writ, company and Admiralty matters, as well as appellate and revisional jurisdiction arising from decisions of subordinate courts and specialized forums.

The High Court Division therefore has a much broader range of functions than simply hearing appeals.

What Is the Original Jurisdiction of the High Court Division?

Original jurisdiction means jurisdiction in which a court can hear a matter at the initial judicial stage rather than merely reviewing a decision already made by a lower court.

The High Court Division exercises original jurisdiction where the Constitution or legislation gives it that authority.

One of the most important examples is its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 102.

Other legislation can also confer original jurisdiction on the High Court Division in particular matters.

This means that not every case before the High Court Division arrives there through an appeal.

Some proceedings properly begin in the High Court Division itself.

What Is the Writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division?

The High Court Division has important constitutional jurisdiction under Article 102.

Article 102 allows the High Court Division, on the application of an aggrieved person, to issue appropriate directions or orders for enforcement of fundamental rights. It also permits other forms of constitutional relief where the conditions specified by the Constitution are satisfied.

This jurisdiction is commonly associated with writ petitions.

Writ proceedings may involve issues such as:

  • Fundamental rights
  • Exercise of public power
  • Administrative decisions
  • Jurisdictional errors
  • Unlawful actions by public authorities
  • Constitutional questions

However, a person cannot assume that every disagreement with a government authority automatically qualifies for a writ petition.

The constitutional requirements, nature of the legal right, availability of alternative remedies and facts of the case must be examined.

What Is Appellate Jurisdiction of the High Court Division?

The High Court Division also hears appeals from subordinate courts and tribunals where the Constitution or legislation gives it appellate jurisdiction.

The Bangladesh Judiciary specifically identifies appellate and revisional jurisdiction arising from decisions of various subordinate courts and specialized forums, including District Judges, Joint District Judges, Sessions Judges, Special Tribunals, Special Judges and Artha Rin Adalats.

For example, depending on the applicable law, a judgment of a subordinate court may be challenged before the High Court Division through an appeal.

The availability and form of an appeal depend on the governing statute.

What Is Revisional Jurisdiction of the High Court Division?

Revision is different from an ordinary appeal.

An appeal generally provides a statutory mechanism for challenging a decision within the scope permitted by the relevant law. Revisional jurisdiction, on the other hand, is available only where the applicable law provides for it and may involve examination of particular legal or jurisdictional errors.

The High Court Division exercises revisional jurisdiction under various laws.

For this reason, a person dissatisfied with a lower-court order should not automatically assume that the correct remedy is either an appeal or revision. The applicable statute and procedural rules should be examined first.

What Is the Appellate Division?

The Appellate Division is the highest appellate division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.

Article 103 of the Constitution provides that the Appellate Division has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from judgments, decrees, orders or sentences of the High Court Division.

This makes the Appellate Division fundamentally different from the High Court Division.

The High Court Division may hear matters at first instance and appeals from subordinate courts. The Appellate Division generally enters the process at a later stage by considering appeals from the High Court Division.

When Is an Appeal to the Appellate Division Available as of Right?

Not every High Court Division judgment automatically creates an appeal as of right.

Article 103 identifies specific circumstances in which an appeal lies as of right.

These include circumstances where the High Court Division:

  1. Certifies that the case involves a substantial question of law concerning interpretation of the Constitution;
  2. Has confirmed a sentence of death or sentenced a person to death or imprisonment for life;
  3. Has imposed punishment on a person for contempt of the High Court Division;
  4. Falls within another category provided by an Act of Parliament.

These constitutional categories are important because they distinguish appeals as of right from cases where leave to appeal is required.

What Is Leave to Appeal?

In cases falling outside the categories where an appeal lies as of right, Article 103 provides that an appeal from a High Court Division judgment, decree, order or sentence lies only if the Appellate Division grants leave to appeal.

This is a crucial distinction.

A party who wants to challenge a High Court Division decision therefore needs to determine whether:

  • An appeal lies as of right; or
  • Leave to appeal is required.

The applicable procedural requirements should be carefully observed.

What Does the Appellate Division Do Besides Hearing Appeals?

The Appellate Division has several constitutional functions.

Appellate Jurisdiction

Its principal function is determining appeals from the High Court Division under Article 103.

Power to Do Complete Justice

Article 104 gives the Appellate Division power to issue directions, orders, decrees or writs necessary for doing complete justice in a cause or matter pending before it.

The constitutional provision also includes powers concerning matters such as securing attendance and discovery or production of documents.

Review Jurisdiction

Article 105 provides that the Appellate Division may review its own judgments or orders, subject to applicable legislation and its rules.

This means that the Appellate Division is not simply an appeal-only court.

Advisory Jurisdiction

Article 106 provides a constitutional advisory mechanism.

Where the President considers that a question of law has arisen or is likely to arise and that the issue is of such public importance that obtaining the Supreme Court's opinion is expedient, the question may be referred to the Appellate Division.

This advisory function is constitutionally distinct from ordinary litigation between private parties.

Can the Appellate Division Hear a Writ Petition Directly?

The general constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 102 belongs to the High Court Division.

Article 102 expressly empowers the High Court Division to issue directions or orders in the circumstances specified by the Constitution.

Therefore, a person should not normally treat the Appellate Division as simply another forum for filing an Article 102 writ petition.

A matter may, however, ultimately reach the Appellate Division through an appeal from a High Court Division decision.

This distinction is one of the most important points when understanding the two divisions.

What Is the Relationship Between the Two Divisions?

The two divisions are constitutionally part of the same Supreme Court, but they operate with different jurisdictions.

A simplified pathway can look like this:

Subordinate Court or Tribunal → High Court Division → Appellate Division

However, this is not the route for every legal matter.

Some proceedings begin directly in the High Court Division because the Constitution or legislation gives it original jurisdiction.

For example:

Aggrieved person → High Court Division → Article 102 proceeding

Similarly, certain matters may proceed through statutory appellate or revisional routes rather than following a single universal sequence.

The correct route depends on the nature of the case and the applicable law.

Which Division Is Higher?

Both divisions form part of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh, but the Appellate Division occupies the highest appellate position.

Article 111 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Appellate Division is binding on the High Court Division, while the law declared by either division of the Supreme Court is binding on all courts subordinate to it.

This creates an important hierarchy of judicial precedent.

In simplified terms:

Appellate Division decisions → binding on High Court Division and subordinate courts

High Court Division decisions → binding on subordinate courts, subject to the constitutional framework and the authority of Appellate Division decisions

Therefore, an Appellate Division judgment has particular precedential authority throughout the judicial system.

Can the High Court Division Overrule the Appellate Division?

No.

Article 111 expressly provides that the law declared by the Appellate Division is binding on the High Court Division.

The High Court Division therefore cannot disregard a binding legal principle declared by the Appellate Division merely because it prefers a different interpretation.

Where an issue reaches the Appellate Division and the Appellate Division declares the applicable law, that declaration has binding force within the constitutional hierarchy.

What Is the Difference Between Original and Appellate Jurisdiction?

This distinction is central to understanding the two divisions.

Original jurisdiction means that the court is hearing a matter within its jurisdiction without acting merely as an appellate court reviewing a lower court's judgment.

Appellate jurisdiction means that the court is reviewing a decision already made by another court or tribunal.

The High Court Division exercises both types of jurisdiction.

The Appellate Division primarily exercises appellate jurisdiction over High Court Division decisions, together with its constitutional review, advisory and other powers.

High Court Division vs Appellate Division: Civil Cases

Civil litigation may reach the Supreme Court through different routes.

A simplified example could be:

Trial-level civil court → appeal → High Court Division → further appeal where legally available → Appellate Division

However, not every civil dispute will follow this exact sequence.

The right of appeal depends on the Code of Civil Procedure and other applicable legislation.

The High Court Division may therefore be involved in a civil matter as an appellate or revisional court, while the Appellate Division may later consider an appeal from the High Court Division if the constitutional and statutory requirements are satisfied.

High Court Division vs Appellate Division: Criminal Cases

Criminal proceedings can also move through different levels.

Depending on the offence, trial court and applicable legislation, a matter may proceed through Magistrate or Sessions-level proceedings before reaching the High Court Division.

The High Court Division has criminal appellate and revisional jurisdiction in matters provided by law.

An appropriate criminal matter may subsequently reach the Appellate Division under Article 103 or other applicable statutory provisions.

The constitutional treatment of death and life-imprisonment cases is particularly significant because Article 103 specifically identifies certain such cases among those where an appeal lies as of right.

High Court Division vs Appellate Division: Constitutional Cases

Constitutional litigation is one of the areas where the distinction between the two divisions becomes especially important.

The High Court Division exercises constitutional jurisdiction under Article 102, including enforcement of fundamental rights and other forms of judicial review within the constitutional conditions.

A decision of the High Court Division in such a proceeding may, where legally permissible, be challenged before the Appellate Division.

Thus, the constitutional pathway can be summarized as:

Article 102 proceeding → High Court Division → appeal or leave to appeal where applicable → Appellate Division

The exact availability of further proceedings depends on the Constitution, applicable law and the nature of the High Court Division decision.

What Is Judicial Review?

Judicial review refers broadly to judicial examination of the legality or constitutional validity of governmental or public-authority action within the court's jurisdiction.

The High Court Division has a major constitutional role in this area under Article 102.

For example, Article 102 allows the High Court Division, subject to its constitutional requirements, to declare that an act or proceeding by a person performing functions in connection with the affairs of the Republic or a local authority has been done or taken without lawful authority and is of no legal effect.

Judicial review is therefore one of the key reasons why the High Court Division is particularly important in constitutional and administrative law.

What Is the Role of the High Court Division in Contempt Matters?

The High Court Division has jurisdiction in contempt matters.

This is also relevant to the appellate structure because Article 103 identifies punishment imposed by the High Court Division for contempt as one of the circumstances in which an appeal to the Appellate Division lies as of right.

The Supreme Court also maintains separate procedural rules governing the work of its two divisions. Its official website provides the Appellate Division Rules and High Court Division Rules.

Does the High Court Division Control Subordinate Courts?

Yes, within the constitutional and statutory framework.

Article 109 provides that the High Court Division has superintendence and control over all courts and tribunals subordinate to it.

This is an important distinction from the Appellate Division.

The High Court Division is therefore not merely an appellate court. It also has a constitutional supervisory role over subordinate courts and tribunals.

Can a Case Be Transferred to the High Court Division?

Article 110 contains a constitutional mechanism under which the High Court Division may withdraw a case pending in a subordinate court where the constitutional conditions specified in that Article are satisfied.

The provision concerns cases involving a substantial question of law regarding interpretation of the Constitution or a point of general public importance where determination of that issue is necessary for disposal of the case.

This demonstrates another aspect of the High Court Division's constitutional role.

What Happens After an Appellate Division Judgment?

An Appellate Division judgment is subject to the constitutional framework concerning review.

Article 105 provides that the Appellate Division has power to review its own judgment or order, subject to any Act of Parliament and its rules.

Therefore, a party should not assume that an Appellate Division judgment can be challenged through an ordinary appeal to another higher court.

The Appellate Division is the highest appellate division of the Supreme Court.

Any further proceeding must therefore arise from a legally recognized mechanism such as review, where applicable.

What Is the Difference Between Appeal, Review and Revision?

These terms should not be used interchangeably.

Appeal

An appeal challenges a decision through a legally authorized appellate process.

Revision

Revision is a distinct statutory remedy available only where the relevant law confers revisional jurisdiction.

Review

Review allows a court to reconsider its own judgment or order within the scope permitted by the Constitution, legislation and applicable rules.

At the Supreme Court level, Article 105 expressly recognizes the Appellate Division's power to review its own judgments or orders.

The correct remedy depends on the type of decision, the court that issued it and the applicable legal provision.

Does Every High Court Division Judgment Go to the Appellate Division?

No.

A High Court Division decision does not automatically proceed to the Appellate Division.

Depending on the nature of the case, a party may have:

  • An appeal as of right
  • A requirement to obtain leave to appeal
  • Another statutory remedy
  • A review-related remedy
  • No further ordinary appellate remedy

Article 103 is therefore critical when determining whether and how a High Court Division judgment can be challenged before the Appellate Division.

What Does "Leave to Appeal" Mean in Practical Terms?

Leave to appeal is permission granted by the Appellate Division to bring an appeal where an appeal does not lie as of right under the applicable constitutional or statutory framework.

This means that a party cannot simply assume that filing an appeal is enough.

The party may first have to satisfy the requirements for obtaining leave.

Because leave applications involve technical procedural requirements, limitation issues and the legal grounds relied upon, professional legal assistance is often important.

How Are the Benches of the Supreme Court Organized?

The Supreme Court operates through benches assigned to particular judicial business.

The official Supreme Court website publishes separate lists and resources for the Appellate Division and High Court Division, including judges' lists, cause lists, judgments and other court information.

The Supreme Court also publishes its rules governing proceedings before both divisions.

Consequently, the procedure for a particular matter should be checked against the applicable rules rather than inferred simply from the fact that both divisions form part of the same Supreme Court.

Can the Supreme Court Make Law?

Courts do not ordinarily enact legislation in the same way Parliament does.

However, courts interpret constitutional and statutory provisions when deciding cases.

Article 111 gives the law declared by the Appellate Division binding force over the High Court Division, while the law declared by either division is binding on subordinate courts.

This doctrine of binding precedent makes Supreme Court judgments extremely important when researching Bangladeshi law.

A lawyer therefore needs to consider not only the wording of an Act but also relevant authoritative judicial decisions.

Why Is the Difference Between the Two Divisions Important?

Knowing the difference can help a person understand:

  • Where a case should begin
  • Whether a matter can be brought directly before the High Court Division
  • Whether a lower-court judgment can be appealed to the High Court Division
  • Whether a High Court Division judgment can be challenged before the Appellate Division
  • Whether leave to appeal is required
  • Whether a matter concerns constitutional jurisdiction
  • Whether revision is available
  • Whether review is available
  • Which court's precedent is binding

A procedural mistake can have serious consequences, particularly where limitation periods or statutory filing requirements apply.

Practical Example: A Writ Petition

Suppose a government authority takes an action that an affected person argues is unlawful and violates a constitutional right.

The person may consider whether Article 102 jurisdiction of the High Court Division is available.

If the High Court Division decides the matter, the affected party may, where the Constitution and law permit, seek further appellate relief before the Appellate Division.

The pathway is therefore not:

Government decision → Appellate Division

It is more commonly:

Government decision → Article 102 proceeding before High Court Division → further proceeding before Appellate Division where legally available

The precise remedy depends on the facts and constitutional requirements.

Practical Example: A Civil Appeal

Suppose a civil dispute is decided by a subordinate court.

If the relevant law provides an appeal to the High Court Division, the party may challenge the decision there.

If the High Court Division subsequently gives a judgment from which further appeal is constitutionally or statutorily available, the matter may proceed to the Appellate Division.

However, the second stage is not automatic.

Article 103 determines when an appeal lies as of right and when leave to appeal is necessary.

Practical Example: A Criminal Case

Suppose an accused is convicted by a criminal court.

Depending on the offence and applicable law, the matter may proceed through the statutory appellate structure.

The High Court Division may have appellate or revisional jurisdiction in the circumstances provided by law.

Certain serious cases receive specific constitutional treatment under Article 103. For example, where the High Court Division has confirmed a sentence of death or sentenced a person to death or imprisonment for life, the Constitution identifies this among the circumstances where an appeal to the Appellate Division lies as of right.

How Can You Find Supreme Court Judgments?

The official Supreme Court of Bangladesh website provides separate resources for the Appellate Division and High Court Division.

These include:

  • Appellate Division judgments
  • High Court Division judgments
  • Cause lists
  • Orders
  • Judges' lists
  • Court rules
  • Case-related services

The official website is therefore an important primary source for researching Supreme Court decisions and procedures.

For important legal research, a judgment should be read in its proper procedural and factual context rather than relying only on a short online summary.

How Can You Determine Which Division Has Jurisdiction?

Before approaching the Supreme Court, consider the following questions:

  1. What type of legal dispute is involved?
  2. Is there already a judgment or order from another court?
  3. Which court issued that decision?
  4. Does the Constitution confer original jurisdiction?
  5. Does an Act of Parliament provide appellate jurisdiction?
  6. Is the matter appropriate for Article 102?
  7. Is an appeal available?
  8. Is leave to appeal required?
  9. Is revision available?
  10. Is there a limitation period?
  11. What documents are required?
  12. Which Supreme Court rules apply?

These questions can prevent the common mistake of assuming that any important legal dispute can simply be filed in the Supreme Court.

Common Misconceptions About the Supreme Court of Bangladesh

"The High Court Division is a lower court."

This is misleading.

The High Court Division is one of the two divisions of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. It is a superior constitutional court with extensive original, appellate, revisional and supervisory jurisdiction.

"Every High Court case automatically goes to the Appellate Division."

Incorrect.

Further appeal depends on the Constitution and applicable law. In many cases, leave to appeal may be required.

"The Appellate Division hears all cases directly."

Incorrect.

The Appellate Division primarily hears appeals from the High Court Division.

"A writ petition is filed in the Appellate Division."

Generally incorrect.

The constitutional writ jurisdiction under Article 102 belongs to the High Court Division.

"Appeal, revision and review mean the same thing."

They do not.

Each remedy has a different legal basis, scope and procedural framework.

"A Supreme Court judgment can always be appealed again."

No.

The Appellate Division is the highest appellate division of the Supreme Court. Article 105 provides a review mechanism for its own judgments and orders, subject to applicable law and rules.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Appellate Division higher than the High Court Division?

Yes, in terms of appellate hierarchy. Both are divisions of the Supreme Court, but the Appellate Division is the highest appellate division and its declared law is binding on the High Court Division.

What is the main function of the High Court Division?

The High Court Division exercises original, appellate, revisional and other jurisdiction under the Constitution and legislation. It also has important constitutional jurisdiction under Article 102.

What is the main function of the Appellate Division?

Its principal function is to hear and determine appeals from judgments, decrees, orders and sentences of the High Court Division. It also has review and advisory jurisdiction under the Constitution.

Can a case start in the High Court Division?

Yes. The High Court Division has original jurisdiction in matters conferred by the Constitution and legislation, including constitutional proceedings under Article 102.

Can a case start in the Appellate Division?

The Appellate Division primarily exercises appellate jurisdiction. It is not the ordinary court of first instance for general civil or criminal disputes.

What is Article 102 of the Bangladesh Constitution?

Article 102 provides the High Court Division with constitutional power to issue directions and orders in specified circumstances, including enforcement of fundamental rights and certain forms of judicial review.

What is Article 103?

Article 103 establishes the appellate jurisdiction of the Appellate Division over judgments, decrees, orders and sentences of the High Court Division and identifies circumstances in which an appeal lies as of right or requires leave.

What is Article 105?

Article 105 gives the Appellate Division power to review its own judgments or orders, subject to applicable legislation and its rules.

What is Article 111?

Article 111 establishes the binding effect of Supreme Court precedent. The law declared by the Appellate Division binds the High Court Division, and the law declared by either division binds subordinate courts.

Can the High Court Division review an Appellate Division judgment?

The High Court Division cannot overrule a binding declaration of law made by the Appellate Division. The Appellate Division has constitutional power under Article 105 to review its own judgments or orders, subject to applicable law and rules.

Where can I find official Supreme Court judgments?

The official Supreme Court of Bangladesh website provides separate judgment, order and cause-list resources for the Appellate Division and High Court Division.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court of Bangladesh consists of two constitutionally distinct divisions: the High Court Division and the Appellate Division.

The High Court Division has broad original, appellate, revisional and constitutional jurisdiction. It is particularly important for writ petitions, judicial review and appeals or revisions arising from subordinate courts and tribunals.

The Appellate Division is the highest appellate division of the Supreme Court. It principally hears appeals from the High Court Division and also exercises constitutional powers concerning review, complete justice and advisory jurisdiction.

The simplest way to remember the distinction is:

High Court Division: original jurisdiction + constitutional jurisdiction + appeals and revisions

Appellate Division: highest appellate jurisdiction + review + other constitutional functions

The distinction matters because choosing the correct forum and remedy is a fundamental part of legal strategy. A person cannot simply choose between the two divisions based on preference. Jurisdiction is determined by the Constitution, legislation, Supreme Court rules and the circumstances of the case.

For anyone involved in litigation in Bangladesh, the most important practical questions are therefore not only "What is my legal right?" but also "Which court has jurisdiction?", "What remedy is available?", "Is leave required?", and "What is the proper procedural route?"

Because constitutional interpretation and Supreme Court procedure can be technically complex, significant matters should be reviewed by a qualified advocate using the current Constitution, legislation, Supreme Court rules and relevant judgments.